Pages

January 31, 2015

Monarch Butterflies Slowly Making a Comeback

monarch butterflies
(Photo : Flickr: Luna sin estrellas)

Monarch butterflies, which have recently been facing severe habitat loss in the United States, are slowly making a comeback, showing conservationists that they are down, but not out.

Amazingly, the number of monarchs that made it to their wintering grounds in Mexico has rebounded 69 percent from last year's record-low levels. The fluttering insects covered 2.79 acres (1.13 hectares), up from only 1.65 acres (0.67 hectares) last year, according to a census released Tuesday by Mexican authorities.

However, the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) is quick to point out that their numbers are still incredibly low compared to what they once were, and monarch butterflies are not yet in the clear.

"Of course it is good news that the forest area occupied by monarchs this season increased," Omar Vidal, head of the WWF in Mexico, told The Associated Press (AP). "But lets be crystal clear, 1.13 hectares is very, very low, and it is still the second-smallest forest surface occupied by this butterfly in 22 years of monitoring."

Each year, as the last autumn leaves fall, million of monarchs in the northeastern United States and Canada migrate a stunning 2,500 miles to their wintering habitat in Mexico. But as intensive logging activity destroys crucial fir tree forests, far fewer butterflies have been seen making the trip.

In fact, the US Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) reported in December that the butterflies had declined by a whopping 90 percent over the past 20 years, prompting talks of granting them federal protections under the Endangered Species Act.

But regrettably, illegal logging in Mexico is not the only threat to these beautiful black-and-orange butterflies. Climate change and loss of milkweed- the main food source for monarch larvae - in the United States are causing their numbers to decrease as well. (Scroll to read on...)

(Photo : David R. Tribble)

Use of herbicides, or chemicals sprayed on genetically modified crops such as corn and soybeans, are mostly to blame for the latter. In the last 20 years, these orange and black butterflies have lost more than 165 million acres of vital habitat once overflowing with milkweed plants - an area about the size of Texas.

"The question we should all be asking now," Vidal told the AP, is whether the United States can halt the loss of milkweed habitat.

Authorities are even turning to backyard gardeners for help, asking them to plant native milkweeds. Unfortunately, these good intentions have gone awry, inadvertently trapping and exposing these near-endangered insects to harmful parasites when gardeners began planting the wrong kind.

With logging, milkweed loss, climate change and parasites to worry about, it's a wonder monarch butterflies even managed to bounce back this year. But they've done it before.

In 2001, rain and freezing temperatures causes populations to plummet, only to double in number the following year, to scientists' amazement. Then in 2004, unfavorable weather, pollution and deforestation caused another drastic decline in the population, but the next year, the butterflies rebounded.

Now it seems that monarchs are partially recovering yet again, although overall the species is in decline.

Two decades ago it would have seemed highly unlikely that North America's monarchs would be endangered, given that one billion of these butterflies were flittering across the country in the mid-1990s. But as of last winter there are only 35 million left, the lowest their population has ever been.

Even with this partial population spike, Lincoln Brower, a leading entomologist at Sweet Briar College in Virginia, has told the AP that with anything below 2 hectares (4.1 acres), "they will remain in the danger category and I will continue to be concerned. "

For more great nature science stories and general news, please visit our sister site, Headlines and Global News (HNGN).

post from sitemap

January 30, 2015

Florida Python Hunters Turn Up Empty-handed

African Rock Python
(Photo : Flickr: Yathin)

Florida state wildlife officials and specialists spent this week searching for northern African rock pythons just outside of the everglades in a continued effort to keep the species from invading the vulnerable tropical wetlands. They called it quits on Thursday, reporting zero finds, and while that may sound bad, it's actually really good news.

Since their discovery in 2001 in Miami-Dade Country, 29 of these large invasive constrictors have been hunted down and captured during monthly surveys. The snake hunts are all part of an effort launched by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) to keep the python from reaching its other invasive cousins, the infamous Burmese python, which has been wreaking havoc in the everglades for far too long.

"Unlike the Burmese python in Florida, the Northern African python population is thought to be confined to a small area in a single county," FWC biologist Jenny Ketterlin Eckles, explained in a statement. "Focused efforts by the FWC and partners to locate and remove these invasive snakes could prevent the spread of this species into natural areas and inform management actions to address the Burmese python population."

And Eckles remains hopeful. Turning up empty handed after a week-long hunt for the snakes along the rugged Tamiami Trail is actually a very good thing. According to the FWC, their staff and the specialists it commissions have had years to hone their snake-hunting skills in search for the massive (up to 20 ft long) but often well-concealed predators. If they can't find them, it's very likely that few are left.

"We think they're confined to a small area," Eckles reiterated in an interview with the Sun Sentinel. "We are increasing our efforts in hopes that we can eradicate them."

She added that no one exactly know how the snakes got there in the first place, but like with the Burmese, all it takes is a pair of escapees from a careless pet owners home to birth a powerful invading force.

And in the case of the Burmese python army, conservationists and wildlife officials were made aware of it far too late. Last year alone 141 Burmese were removed from the 1.5 million-acre Everglades National Park, and ecologists say it very likely that that barely dented the snakes' population. There, it's even harder to find pythons than it is in Florida suburbs and the Tamiami Trail, even while the snakes are surrounded by prey with hardly any predators strong enough to threaten them. In these conditions, they can breed like crazy and disrupt a delicate ecosystem in the process. (Scroll to read on...)

Burmese Python (Python molurus)
(Photo : Wiki CC0 - Ltshears) Burmese Python (Python molurus)

That's one of the leading reasons that the FWC can't afford to let the northern African rock python reach the wetlands as well. It's one thing to fight a costly war of attrition against one snake army, but two? That would be a catastrophe.

Still, with this last hunt ending in zero discoveries, victory may be close at hand. Eckles added that while she doesn't believe the fight against the African python is done yet, the FCW will likely be able to declare their work a success if the snake doesn't resurface over the next few years.

"It's a big deal to have a success story and say we did it," Brian Smith, a University of Florida researcher told the Miami Herald.

The problem, he went on to say, is that resolving the African python problem will do nothing to help solve the  Burmese conundrum. The difference in hunting methods and situation, he explained, is too great.

Frank Mazzotti, a colleague of Smith's and a wildlife ecologist, added that currently biologists only have a 1 percent detection rate for Burmese in the Everglades. That rate, he suggests, needs to be at least 50 times greater to make an impact.

"We're not going to win this war until we develop the atom bomb," he told the Herald.

The trouble is, despite a tentative victory on a nearby front, that hypothetical war-winning bomb remains a pipe dream.

For more great nature science stories and general news, please visit our sister site, Headlines and Global News (HNGN).

post from sitemap

January 29, 2015

'Static Spider Silk' is Incredibly Thin and Strong

spider
You've likely heard that silk is incredibly strong. Spider silk in particular can be both strong and mind-bogglingly thin, hinting that nature is still the master spinster. Now, after studying the remarkable webs of one common garden spider, researchers think they are just a bit closer to learning nature's craft. (Photo : Hartmut Kronenberger & Katrin Kronenberger (Oxford University))

You've likely heard that silk is incredibly strong. Spider silk in particular can be both strong and mind-bogglingly thin, hinting that nature is still the master spinster. Now, after studying the remarkable webs of one common garden spider, researchers think they are just a bit closer to learning nature's craft.

When you think of spider webs, a network of thin and sticky webs likely come to mind. Its remarkable how these threads, only several micrometers thick, can span relatively great distances without breaking.

However, what's more amazing still is that some spiders spin silk that is even thinner. According to a study recently published in the journal Biology Letters, the feather-legged lace weaver (Uloborus plumipes) can spin filaments so thin that they are measured on the nano-scale.

So how the heck can a thread be made so thin without breaking with even a light breeze? Researchers from Oxford University collected several adult female Uloborus lace weavers from garden centers in Hampshire, UK, to find out.

The team closely analyzed video and photographs of the spiders in action, weaving unusual "dry capture webs." These webs rely on their incredibly fine and puffed filaments to tangle and capture prey, as opposed to the sticky fluid that coats the thicker webs of other spiders.

They also closely examined the silk-generating organs of these spiders under microscope, paying special attention to the cribellum, an ancient spinning organ not found in many spiders that helps facilitate this "dry" silk production.

"Uloborus has unique cribellar glands, amongst the smallest silk glands of any spider, and it's these that yield the ultra-fine 'catching wool' of its prey capture thread," first study author Katrin Kronenberger explained in a statement. "The raw material, silk dope, is funneled through exceptionally narrow and long ducts into tiny spinning nozzles or spigots. Importantly, the silk seems to form only just before it emerges at the uniquely-shaped spigots of this spider."

However, what makes these dry webs "sticky" enough to hold onto insects is actually static electricity. As the silk is produced, the spider violently combs and hacks at the threads with the feather-like hairs on their hind legs.

"The extreme thinness of each filament, in addition to the charges applied during spinning, provides Van der Waals adhesion. And this makes these puffs immensely sticky," added Fritz Vollrath, who was also involved in the study.

The researcher theorize that not only does this dry stickiness catch prey, but it also help hold incredible thin an complex webs together.

For more great nature science stories and general news, please visit our sister site, Headlines and Global News (HNGN).

post from sitemap

January 28, 2015

Chinese Officials Caught Eating Endangered Salamander, Attack Photographers

giant salamanders
Reports are flooding in that officials in South China's Guangdong Province were allegedly caught with their mouths full of a critically endangered salamander just last week. Undercover press documenting the dinner were reportedly attacked after being ousted. An investigation is ongoing.
[Pictured: a pair of giant salamanders being sold in a restaurant in Hongqiao (虹桥), Wenzhou, Zhejiang] (Photo : Wiki CC0 - Micromesistius)

Reports are flooding in that officials in South China's Guangdong Province were allegedly caught with their mouths full of a critically endangered salamander just last week. Undercover press documenting the dinner were reportedly attacked after being ousted. An investigation is ongoing.

According to a story first reported by the Nandu Daily and the Chinese tabloid Global Times, 14 police officers from the Guangdong Province have been suspended and an investigation is underway after they attacked two journalists and their photographer at a restaurant at Luohu district, Shenzhen.

The journalists were reportedly kicked and slapped, and one man's hands were bloodied after having his cell phone stolen by the officials' security team. A camera was also destroyed, and the photographer reportedly took the worst of the beating.

According to the journalists, an incredibly rare giant salamander was being consumed at the event.

And while the Global Times is infamous for its taste in all things scandalous, it appears there is a great deal of truth behind the story. The Agence France Presse reported on Tuesday that one official, of 28 diners, is already under investigation.

The Chinese Giant Salamander (Andrias davidianus) is critically endangered, according to the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, largely due to overexploitation of the animal for decadent meals. In some circles, the flesh of this animal is thought to prevent again - a rumor not supported by the Chinese Medicine Societies and traditional practitioners.

One man, according to reports, was claiming that the salamander had been raised in captivity for the sole purpose of consumption, while another was quoted as saying "in my territory, it is my treat."

Chinese President Xi Jinping has launched a much-publicized austerity drive for the ruling classes, condemning decadent and often illegal meals such as these.

However, that has not seemed to stop the elite in the nation. A wealthy China-man was recently sentenced to 13 years in prison for purchasing and then consuming at least three tigers in the course of a year, while the legal farming of some endangered species may actually be promoting illegal trade.

For more great nature science stories and general news, please visit our sister site, Headlines and Global News (HNGN).

post from sitemap

January 27, 2015

A Hidden Hunger: How Bee Decline Can Hurt Humans Too

bee
(Photo : Pixabay)
You've likely heard of the global decline in pollinators, a trend sparked by invasive parasites, climate change, and infamously harmful pesticides. Now a new study has revealed why more people should be trying to 'save the bees.' Their decline is hurting humans too, leaving a good number of developing countries at risk of malnutrition.

That's at least according to a study recently published in the journal PLOS One, which details the first concrete evidence of how the health of pollinator populations can directly influence human nutrition.

Researchers from the University of Vermont and Harvard University make the argument that a decline in organisms that keep crops prevalent and productive (pollinators) is leading to a decline in crop yields and nutrition, exacerbating the "hidden hunger" of vitamin and mineral deficiencies in third-world countries.

"The take-home is: pollinator declines can really matter to human health, with quite scary numbers for vitamin A deficiencies, for example," study co-lead Taylor Ricketts said in a statement.

He added that vitamin A deficiency can lead to blindness and increased death rates for diseases already rampant in undeveloped worlds - malaria being a lead concern.

That "hidden hunger," the team writes, is already affecting more than 25 percent of the world's citizens, contributing to the spread of disease, heightened child mortality, reduced IQ, and an exhausted working class. (Scroll to read on...)

(Photo : pixabay)

"This is the first study that quantifies the potential human health impacts of animal pollinator declines," co-lead Samuel Myers added. "To evaluate whether pollinator declines will really affect human nutrition, you need to know what people are eating."

And that, pressed, Ricketts, is exactly what the team looked at. By measuring what kinds of crops, be it vegetable or fruit, were supplementing or even sustaining the diets of various regions, the team was able to then determine if pollinator declines  would impact the availability of vitamin A, calcium, folate, iron, and zinc sources for local human population.

"We found really alarming effects in some countries for some nutrients and little to no effect elsewhere," Ricketts said.

And while that was expected for regions reliant on imports, even some of the poorest regions examined - among parts of Zambia, Mozambique, Uganda and Bangladesh - still seemed perfectly fine.

Why? It really all came down to luck. While pollinator declines were associated strongest with mounting vitamin A deficiencies, some regions, like Zambia, simply had so much Vitamin A in the standard diet already that the cut wasn't felt, even if crop quality and yields have suffered.

Unfortunately, not every region was so lucky. The team found that up to 56 percent of the studied populations was doomed to suffer from severe vitamin deficiencies if pollinators continue to disappear.

"Continued declines of pollinator populations could have drastic consequences for global public health," the team warms, making a call for greater conservation and recovery efforts even in the often forgotten and ignored parts of the world.

The US, for instance has already taken action to see their severely reduced honeybee populations restored. Likewise, Europe and Australia have adapted their own methods for keeping threatened populations healthy, introducing new breeding programs and protective plans.

However, undeveloped countries do not have the education nor the means to take this matter into their own hands, even as they struggle to survive off consequentially declining harvests.

Ricketts argues that with his team's results, action should be taken to make pollinator protection an international issue of human interest, not just one for insects and nature lovers.

"Ecosystem damage can damage human health," he said. "so conservation can be thought of as an investment in public health."

For more great nature science stories and general news, please visit our sister site, Headlines and Global News (HNGN).

post from sitemap

January 25, 2015

Sea Otter Pup Conceived in Wild is First to be Born in Captivity

sea otter
For the first time ever, a sea otter pup [not pictured] conceived in the wild was born in captivity, according to researchers at the University of California Santa Cruz (UCSC), giving them a rare look at otter motherhood. (Photo : Pixabay)

For the first time ever, a sea otter pup conceived in the wild was born in captivity, according to researchers at the University of California Santa Cruz (UCSC), giving them a rare look at otter motherhood.

The rare birth happened a while back, on Nov. 26, at the university's Long Marine Laboratory, but researchers decided to keep it under wraps and not publicize the pup until now to limit its exposure to people. This way, unlike its mother Clara, it doesn't develop an attraction to humans, the Santa Cruz Sentinel reported.

Researchers plan to release the nameless pup, whose gender still remains unknown, back into the wild this summer.

In the meantime, the UCSC team is monitoring the otter mom, paying special attention to her caloric needs as she nurses.

That's because the demands of sea otter motherhood can prove costly. In what's called end-lactation syndrome, sea otter moms work so hard to provide for their pups that they zap themselves of all energy and cannot survive the stress of a even minor wound or infection. Sea otters already have high caloric needs - they require a quarter of their body weight in food each day - so adding nursing into the mix is a recipe for disaster.

"End-lactation syndrome makes them more susceptible to something else, that ultimately puts the nail in the coffin," Nicole Thometz, a UCSC postdoctoral researcher, told the Sentinel.

But this new otter pup may help researchers better understand this fatal syndrome, which is found especially in animals living along the Central Coast.

Southern sea otters are currently listed as threatened after unchecked hunting reduced depleted populations to about 50 in the 1930s. Now they number around 3,000 individuals off the California coast, which puts them just under the cusp of being removed from the threatened species list.

And this newest pup may contribute to the growth of its species in the wild.

For more great nature science stories and general news, please visit our sister site, Headlines and Global News (HNGN).

post from sitemap

January 24, 2015

For Mice, Bigger Balls Aren't Always Better

mice
(Photo : Maggie Bartlett, NHGRI)

Yes, those balls. You know the ones I'm talking about. The man rocks, the family jewels, the subject of that ACDC song we've all tried to forget about. In the great mammalian sex race, a male with big balls is likely a very successful reproducer, being both dominant and popular with the ladies. New research has found that with mice, however, this isn't always the case. The best balls, experts are now claiming, don't always take up a lot of space.

That's at least according to a study recently published in the journal Evolution, which details how sexual selection in mice doesn't appear to encourage larger testicles, as seen in other mammals. Instead, where there are plenty of ladies to go around, male mice seem to be developing testes that can produce more sperm without growing in size.

That's a lot different from how things are in nature. As seem in lions, gorillas, and other large mammals, dominant males - the ones that see the most sexual partners in their lifetime - often also boast larger testicles. This, past research argues, is so that these males can boast a larger sperm supply and "recharge time" in order to spread their seed as quickly and frequently as possible.

However, when Renée Firman at the University of Western Australia, and her colleagues set mice up in a monogamous system where there were so many females that male mice did not have to compete with one another, the most successful breeders wound up not having massive testes, but simply more dense testes.

This density correlated with more sperm-producing tissue, but did not necessarily lead to a spike in testes size. In a polygamous situation however, where males were in competition to spread their seed, dominant males quickly gained larger testes each generation.

"Our mouse study is the first to provide unequivocal evidence that sperm competition selects for an increase in the density of sperm-producing tissue, and consequently, increased testes efficiency," Firman recently told New Scientist.

She and her colleague observed that even with smaller testes compared to the polygamous males, the monogamous males were still as productive for the first few generations. However, there comes a point when bigger simply has to be better. In just 24 generations, testes from polygamous males contained more sperm-producing tissue than those of monogamous males, despite that advantage in density.

That is to say, while size isn't everything like once thought, it still matter for a whole lot.

For more great nature science stories and general news, please visit our sister site, Headlines and Global News (HNGN).

post from sitemap

January 23, 2015

Is Ebola Driving Gorilla Extinction?

gorilla
(Photo : Pixabay)

A year into West Africa's Ebola epidemic, the WHO has reported more than 7,500 deaths and nearly 20,000 confirmed cases among humans. And while it's understandable why the media has focused on these tragic numbers, some researchers are saying that we're missing something equally tragic: nearly a third of the world's gorillas and chimpanzees have died from Ebola since the 1990s.

Ebola isn't exactly a virus that needs an introduction*. It has been causing complete disarray in West Africa for the greater part of the last 12 months, jumping from Guinea's most remote regions to its capital, and on to Liberia, Sierra Leone, and other bordering countries. Symptoms include severe fever, vomiting, diarrhea, and horrific bleeding from the eyes, ears, mouth, and rectum.

And while that sounds bad enough for human cases, it's so much worse for great apes (gorillas, chimps, etc.) that boast a mortality rate ranging from 77 to 95 percent. Among humans, the virus is known to kill only half its victims, and that statistic is expected to improve as healthcare facilities become more practiced in responding to and treating an infection, according to the World Health Organization (WHO).

Meera Inglis, a conservation policy expert at the University of Sheffield, recently made the case in The Conversation that the rush for finding and distributing an effective Ebola vaccine should also be aimed at helping great apes too.

After all, the IUCN has listed the Eastern Gorilla (Gorilla beringei) as endangered and the Western Gorilla (Gorilla gorilla) as critically endangered. Both of these populations have heavily suffered from Ebola outbreaks in the recent past.

Inglis reported how in 1995, an outbreak killed more than 90 percent of the gorillas in Minkébé Park in northern Gabon. Also, in 2002 and 2003, a year-long outbreak of ZEBOV (the Zaire strain of Ebola) in the Democratic Republic of Congo killed an estimated 5,000 Western gorillas.

"It's hard to accurately count such elusive creatures but the WWF estimates there are up to 100,000 left in the wild - so a single Ebola outbreak wiped out a considerable chunk of the world's gorilla population," she explained.

Inglis is not alone in her concern, either. Sadi Ryan, from the SUNY College for of Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse, and Peter D. Walsh from the University of Cambridge published a study back in 2011 that details how a single Ebola outbreak - one just a fraction of the size of the epidemic that West Africa is experiencing - could set ape populations back so far that it would take several lifetimes for them to recover. This would only be exacerbated by other threats to gorillas and chimps more commonly heard about, such as poaching, deforestation, and pollution. (Scroll to read on...)

(Photo : pixabay)

A study published last year in the Journal of Animal Ecology adds a bit of context to these concerns, finding evidence that Ebola disrupts gorillas in a very unique way.

Investigators detailed how, once gorillas become aware of an Ebola threat, they begin to purposely isolate themselves, no longer interacting with neighboring populations and only rarely breeding. The result? The virus quickly runs out of hosts, disappearing from shrinking populations entirely in the course of a few months.

However, this also leads to reduced birth rates and disrupted social dynamics among normally very communal animals. Researchers worry that it could take generations for gorilla groups to move back and repopulate a region.

"At this moment in time Ebola is the single greatest threat to the survival of gorillas and chimpanzees," Inglis argues. "If we do not act fast, these may prove to be the last decades in which apes can continue to live in their natural habitat."

So what can be done?

"As a short-term strategy, vaccination could prove enormously useful in tackling the Ebola crisis in apes," Inglis wrote.

Vaccines are often tested on primates first before being prepared for human trials. Adding a stage that also specializes a vaccine for apes, she argues, shouldn't be too hard. However, many nations have banned medical experimentation on great apes specifically because of how cognitively similar they are to humans - an ethical argument of personhood.

"The question," Inglis presses, "is whether or not we should make an exception in this case."

*Explore the history of Ebola here.

For more great nature science stories and general news, please visit our sister site, Headlines and Global News (HNGN).

post from sitemap

January 22, 2015

Managing Mosquitoes by Cracking a Few Eggs

Mosquito
It's no secret that mosquitoes are the cause of a lot of suffering in the world. Malaria, Dengue fever, chikungunya, and West Nile are just a few names infamously associated with those little bloodsuckers that we all hate. Now researchers are proposing a new way to control their numbers without eliminating the bugs entirely - by attacking egg production. (Photo : Pixabay)

It's no secret that mosquitoes are the cause of a lot of suffering in the world. Malaria, Dengue fever, chikungunya, and West Nile are just a few names infamously associated with those little bloodsuckers that we all hate. Now researchers are proposing a new way to control their numbers without eliminating the bugs entirely - by attacking egg production.

It's not exactly like the world doesn't have many means of controlling mosquito populations already. Pesticides have long been a last resort that third-world countries will still employ. Other, more modern and less environmentally harmful approaches have also started seeing use, including experimental DNA manipulation and designer bacterial infection. Many countries are even introducing sterile males into a population to help "dilute" the number of successful reproducers.

However, many of these options pose the threat of eliminating mosquitoes entirely, which could gravely impact certain delicate ecosystems. Even the safest solution - the dilution approach - requires the regular release of thousands of sterile males, meaning that an expensive lab - often called a "mosquito factory" - has to be set up in the hub of an affected region.

Now, researchers are claiming in a study recently published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) that they have identified an essential regulator in female mosquito egg production, opening up the best chance yet at limiting mosquito populations in a safe and inexpensive way.

This was accomplished after researchers from the University of California paid special attention to the mechanics of micro-RNAs (miRNA) in female mosquito ovary and egg development.

For simplicity, RNA is best described as a sort of "DNA middleman" - where DNA makes RNA, which makes proteins. These proteins are essential for processes in any living being's body, and the researchers were able to identify miRNA-8 as an essential regulator of mosquito reproductive events.

"To our knowledge, this is the first time a mosquito miRNA has been investigated in this specific manner," Alexander Raikhel, who helped lead the study, said in a statement. "In the lab, female transgenic mosquitoes with deficiency in miRNA-8 displayed severely compromised ovary development and reduced egg-laying."

And, as can be expected, reduced egg-lay ultimately leads to smaller populations. However, the researchers are quick to add that this is just the first stage in a long process of developing an ideal "birth control" for mosquitoes.

For more great nature science stories and general news, please visit our sister site, Headlines and Global News (HNGN).

post from sitemap

January 21, 2015

Population of India's Iconic Tigers Up More Than 30 Percent

tiger
The population of India's iconic tigers is up more than 30 percent in just four years, giving conservationists a rare piece of good news for once. (Photo : Pixabay)

The population of India's iconic tigers is up more than 30 percent in just four years, giving conservationists a rare piece of good news for once.

India's Environment Minister Prakash Javadekar announced this week that a 2014 census found 2,226 tigers in India last year, a huge jump compared with 1,706 tigers in 2010. That means India is now home to 70 percent of the world's tigers.

"While the tiger population is falling in the world, it is rising in India. It is great news," Javadekar said, according to the Agence France-Presse (AFP).

Specifically, the state of Karnataka has the highest number of tigers at 408. Uttarakhand follows close behind at 340 tigers, meanwhile Madhya Pradesh has 308, Tamil Nadu has 229, Maharashtra has 190 and the Sundarbans in Bengal has 76 tigers.

The minister credits this "huge success" to improved management practices in the country's more than 40 tiger reserves. The government is also currently working to reduce human encounters with these big cats, because as farmers develop forest land tigers are being forced to abandon their protective areas in search for food and water.

This increase couldn't come at a more crucial time. In 2008, tigers in India had reached an all-time low of 1,411, raising fears that the species would soon disappear altogether.

And while the recent rise is heartwarming, tigers are still far from being out of harm's way.

Just a century ago, there were around 100,000 tigers roaming throughout the world. Now, a total of 3,000 to 4,500 exist in the wild, according to Defenders of Wildlife. Their numbers took a significant toll due to severe habitat loss and rampant poaching.

The illegal tiger farm trade values these exotic animals for their pelts, bones, and even their meat which is used for luxurious "visual feasts."

For more great nature science stories and general news, please visit our sister site, Headlines and Global News (HNGN).

post from sitemap

January 20, 2015

Uncertain Origin of Deadly Distemper Causes Unease in Africa

lion
Back in 1994, a deadly virus swept through Serengeti National park, killing 30 percent of all wild lions in the region. The cause was later revealed to be canine distemper - a shocking revelation as it had long been suspected that cats couldn't contract the virus. Now, new research has found that not only did dogs likely bring the virus to these cats, but it was then spread further by another unidentified species. (Photo : Pixabay)

Back in 1994, a deadly virus swept through Serengeti National park, killing 30 percent of all wild lions in the region. The cause was later revealed to be canine distemper - a shocking revelation as it had long been suspected that cats couldn't contract the virus. Now, new research has found that not only did dogs likely bring the virus to these cats, but it was then spread further by another unidentified species.

That's at least according to a study recently published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), which details how an international team of researchers has found that while the initial 1994 infection of lions came from dogs, a subsequent spike in infections clearly did not. This suggests another species, one that likely roams, could still be carrying the disease and may potentially spread it once more.

This was determined after a large team of biologists set out to investigate the Serengeti distemper outbreak, analyzing serelogical (blood, urine, etc.) data obtained from lions in the park between the years 1984 to 2014, and domestic dog samples collected between 1992 and 2012.

True to its name, canine distemper virus (CDV) was first detected in dogs in the early 1900s, and has since been associated with members of the canaidae (fox, wolf, coyote), procyonidae (panda, raccoon, etc.), and mustelidae (ferret, badger, otter) families. It causes gastrointestinal and respiratory trouble, and leads to high fever, swollen eyes and vomiting. It can also help facilitate deadly bacterial infections of the neurosystem, which always proves fatal.

While the fact that infected dogs caused the 1994 outbreak wasn't exactly a surprise, the researchers were still stunned to see that another species played a part. This is a worrisome discovery because, while domestic dog vaccination programs were subsequently implemented to curb the spread of the disease by 2000, this other species may continue to have CDV looming in the background.

The consequence may be a resurgence of the virus at any time, threatening lion populations already at risk by encroaching human populations.

For more great nature science stories and general news, please visit our sister site, Headlines and Global News (HNGN).

post from sitemap

January 19, 2015

Turkeys With Tumors: New Info on Widespread Virus

turkey
A semi-deadly virus that causes tumors in turkeys has recently been discovered to be far more widespread than thought. Thankfully, experts have also discovered that the virus is far less of a threat to turkey population than thought, easing concerns among ecologists. (Photo : Pixabay)

A semi-deadly virus that causes tumors in turkeys has recently been discovered to be far more widespread than thought.  Thankfully, experts have also discovered that the virus is far less of a threat to turkey population than thought, easing concerns among ecologists.

That's at least according to the preliminary findings of a newly complete study of US wild turkey populations.

Justin Brown, lead researcher at the Southeastern Cooperative Wildlife Disease Study recently told the Associated Press (AP) that the virus in question, called Lymphoproliferative Disease Virus (LPDV), was initially a huge source of worry for conservationists and game authorities alike.

That's because, the disease, while common in Europe and Israel, wasn't seen in the United States until 2009. Then, it was quickly associated with the decline of wild turkey populations regions like upstate New York, Mississippi, and Pennsylvania.

The National Wild Turkey Federation (NWTF) even reported that the net population of wild US turkey has declined 15 percent from the historic high of seven million gobblers.

"New York is facing a 20-year low, and Mississippi's turkey population has declined by more than 40 percent from 2004 to 2009," the NWTF reported back in 2013.

This national decline was seen as a threat to annual turkey hunts - a lucrative pastime for many states. Ecologists were equally worried about this trend, as wild turkeys are a common main course for predators like coyotes, foxes, hawks, and owls, who likewise hold cornerstone positions in ecosystems across North America.

The NWTF places the blame on general habitat loss, as it was estimated that the US loses about 6,000 acres of true wilderness to development every day.

However, "once we discovered [LPDV in the US] and found it was common, there was a big scare," Brown admitted to the AP. "There was a fear that this virus was decimating turkeys and we've missed it all these years." (Scroll to read on...)

wild Rio Grande turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo intermedia)
(Photo : NWTF Via USDA) wild Rio Grande turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo intermedia)

Initial studies of LPDV among turkeys revealed that an infection could promote rampant tissue growth, turning a turkey's head into a mess of tumors. Eventually, these tumors could render a bird blind or even clog its airways, suffocating the poor animal. In that sense, LPDV was relatively fatal, and if it was widely prevalent, it could pose a serious threat to US turkey numbers.

That's where the latest study comes in, following up on initial studies launched since 2009. Bown said that it provides some much needed perspective that should quell fears.

"We found that infection is widespread and common, but the development of tumors is actually a rare event," he explained.

He went on to add that it is still uncertain how often tumors actually develop, or if there are any special circumstances under which it can happen. Still, he could say with certainty that the virus is far less fatal than initially suspected.

And that's fantastic news, especially since there is evidence that LPDV is still spreading to new and unaffected turkey populations.

Back in April the New Hampshire Fish and Game offices reported their first cases of both LPDV and a resurgence of Avian Pox Virus. Unfortunately, it's difficult for field surveyors to differentiate the infected based on appearance alone, as the pox similarly leaves liaisons around a turkey's eyes and throat.

Blind and hungry, the affected turkeys were becoming easy prey for local predators.

Still, you shouldn't worry about North America's turkeys just yet.  Overall numbers are still enormously high when compared to populations in the early part of the twentieth century - when turkey shoots were in their peak, and mass killings were not unheard of. The NYDEC reports that in 1930 North America had 30,000 wild turkeys; today that number hovers around 6.4 million.

For more great nature science stories and general news, please visit our sister site, Headlines and Global News (HNGN).

post from sitemap

DNA Sheds Light on Mysterious Giant Kangaroo

kangaroo
The giant kangaroo, a species that once roamed the Australian outback over 40,000 years ago, has long been extinct, but thanks to scientists that extracted its DNA for the first time we are learning more about this marsupial megafauna. (Photo : Pixabay)

The giant kangaroo, a species that once roamed the Australian outback over 40,000 years ago, has long been extinct, but thanks to scientists that extracted its DNA for the first time we are learning more about this marsupial megafauna.

A team from the University of Adelaide acquired the ancient DNA from the species Simosthenurus occidentalis and Protemnodon anak, or the giant short-faced kangaroo and giant wallaby, respectively. These well-preserved specimens were found in a Tasmanian cave and died around 45,000 years ago.

In the past, poor preservation conditions and the age of Australian megafaunal remains have prevented retrieval of giant kangaroo DNA. In addition, the lack of modern close relatives to extinct giant kangaroos makes it even more difficult to interpret any genetic data.

But with these specimens, the cave's conditions were able to keep the DNA intact, and researchers successfully reconstructed partial "mitochondrial genomes" - genetic material transmitted from mother to offspring that can shed light on evolutionary relationships.

"The ancient DNA reveals that extinct giant wallabies are very close relatives of large living kangaroos, such as the red and western grey kangaroos," lead author Dr. Bastien Llamas said in a statement. "Their skeletons had suggested they were quite primitive macropods - a group that includes kangaroos, wallabies, pademelons and quokkas - but now we can place giant wallaby much higher up the kangaroo family tree."

On the other hand, short-faced kangaroos are a highly distinct lineage of macropods, with no living descendants. However, it's possible that their closest living cousin is the banded hare-wallaby (Lagostrophus fasciatus), which is now restricted to small isolated islands off the coast of Western Australia.

"Our results suggest the banded hare-wallaby is the last living representative of a previously diverse lineage of kangaroos. It will hopefully further encourage and justify conservation efforts for this endangered species," added co-author Mike Lee.

The research was published in the journal Molecular Biology and Evolution.

For more great nature science stories and general news, please visit our sister site, Headlines and Global News (HNGN).

post from sitemap

January 18, 2015

The problem with Pantone color of the year

 

Pantone

 

Pantone

Each year, the creations from around the world design are turning to Pantone Color Institute to guide them in hue will rule for the next 365 days. The year last color, radiant Orchid, a cheerful tone lilac, has been widely praised as one that symbolized the economic recovery, optimism for humanity and a sense of sophisticated lens.

The color of this year, a silent tone scarlet mark "Marsala" received a decidedly bitter response: Social media asked what Pantone calls "an ongoing robust red wine land" as "a color that makes you want to go to Olive Garden or Tampax in bulk. "

The reddish brown color reminds one of rust, coating type induction gag dirty corners or Frat Boy dormitory style bathrooms.

"As the fortified Marsala wine that gives name as this nuance embodies the richness of a good satisfying meal, while rooted reddish brown earth exude a sophisticated, natural earthiness" Leatrice Eiseman, executive director of Pantone Color Institute, said in the news business. "It's warm but stylish is universally appealing and easily translates into fashion, beauty, industrial design, furniture and interior."

 

But bold and exciting looks controversial. While some have found rich color tones and sophisticated real Burgundy, many carried evocation brownstone various processes. Think oxide coating type induction gag dirty corners or Frat Boy dormitory style bathrooms. O blood, dry sex whose strange iron content is exposed to air long enough to evoke a brick boring time.



 

If the year Pantone chosen as a predictor of the coming months will bring, and 2015 and not so rosy looked. Or maybe some chicken Marsala Marsala wine pairing will take care of these issues.



 

Humanity Threatens Seals With Bad Bacteria

gray seal
Between MERS from camels and Ebola from bats (or gorillas), even everyday citizens are learning that deadly diseases jumping from animal to human - called zoonosis - is a lot more common than was thought. Now a new study has revealed that just the reverse can happen, with a dangerous human pathogen somehow finding its way into gray seal colonies. (Photo : Pixabay)

Between MERS from camels and Ebola from bats (or gorillas), even everyday citizens are learning that deadly diseases jumping from animal to human - called zoonosis - is a lot more common than was thought. Now a new study has revealed that just the reverse can happen, with a dangerous human pathogen somehow finding its way into gray seal colonies.

That's at least according to a study recently published in the journal Molecular Ecology, which details how gray seals breeding on Scotland's Isle of May were turning up sick and even dead from Campylobacter infections.

Being a bacteria that triggers food borne illnesses in humans, it had long been thought that Campylobacter would never affect ocean life. Researchers had assumed that, like evil cannot cross water, the bacteria simply was unfit for aquatic travel, only jumping between humans and livestock for as long as health experts have known about it.

However, during autumn of 2011, a team of investigators found the pathogen in nearly half the samples taken from 100 live and 50 recently deceased seal pups.

As is common with many mammals, not all newborn seals are expected to survive their first few months, even if pups born on land like the Isle of May have better survival rates than pups born on ice, according to the IUCN.

Still, what was surprising bout these samples was that the dead pups harboring Campylobacter had signs of intestinal inflammation - the same symptom the infection causes in humans.

"Campylobacter has been previously detected in seals at very, very low levels," Johanna Baily explained in a statement. But "the prevalence we found in gray seal pups was absolutely shocking."

Dale Griffin, a public health microbiologist at the United States Geological Survey, who was not involved in the study, added that it still remains completely unclear how this bacteria is reaching the seals, but he argues that the case for human-to-animal zoonosis is not concrete just yet.

"Are the seals swimming in areas impacted by sewage or wastewater? Or is it that [another] carrier, such as a wild bird, is bringing the infection back to the island?" he asked via the AAAS.

However, according to Baily and her colleagues, what is important is that this case raises awareness: our pathogens can impact other species just as much as theirs impact us. Whether we should take action to fight these diseases in other animals, however, remains a topic for debate.

For more great nature science stories and general news, please visit our sister site, Headlines and Global News (HNGN).

post from sitemap

January 17, 2015

Diving Mammals Endanger Their Hearts For Food

seal
Human divers have long known that they risk heart trouble every time they make for deeper depths. Holding your breath places strain on your heart, and the longer you do it for during physical exertion, the more you risk. Now new research has found that even mammals meant for deep-diving, like seals and dolphins, run these risks, proving that there are some things the heart simply cannot overcome. (Photo : Pixabay)

Human divers have long known that they risk heart trouble every time they make for deeper depths. Holding your breath places strain on your heart, and the longer you do it for during physical exertion, the more you risk. Now new research has found that even mammals meant for deep-diving, like seals and dolphins, run these risks, proving that there are some things the heart simply cannot overcome.

That's at least according to a study recently published in the journal Nature Communications, which details how the seals and bottlenose dolphins suffer from heart arrhythmias at a surprisingly high rate during their deepest dives.

Experts have long known that to achieve their remarkable dive times, well-adapted aquatic mammals can slow their heart-rate (a process called bradycardia) to put less stress on the organ. Other physiological changes have also allowed these species to conserve limited oxygen levels during a dive.

However, exertion has always been tied to a heightened heart rate in mammals, as the heart is normally required to deliver more oxygen as muscles burn through the supply. How marine mammal hearts cope with this exertion when hunting prey during a dive has long remained a mystery.

After all, if a seal's body is telling the heart to slow, but its muscles are asking it to speed up, wouldn't there be trouble?

And yet that, the new study implies, is exactly what happens.

"This study changes our understanding of bradycardia in marine mammals," study lead Terrie Williams, from the University of California, Santa Cruz, said in a statement. "The heart is receiving conflicting signals when the animals exercise intensely at depth, which often happens when they are starting their ascent. We're not seeing lethal arrhythmias, but it is putting the heart in an unsteady state that could make it vulnerable to problems."

This was all determined after wild Weddell seals and trained bottlenose dolphins were outfitted with monitoring devices that recorded their heart rate, swimming stroke frequency, depth, and time, during long dives.

The data showed that when chasing prey, the Weddell seals in particular appeared to alternate between easy glides and short chases to ensure their hearts remained calm. However, in rare instances where increased activity was too much, arrhythmias were noticed.

"This study is not saying that these deep-diving animals will die if they exercise hard at depth," Williams said.

However, she adds that this may explain who many triathletes and other disciplined swimmers face elevated arrhythmia risk. She is currently working with triathlon groups to help mitigate such problems during races.

For more great nature science stories and general news, please visit our sister site, Headlines and Global News (HNGN).

post from sitemap

January 16, 2015

Great Apes and Humans: Conserving Our Evolutionary Relatives [EXCLUSIVE]

gorilla
(Photo : Pixabay)

There is no doubt that apes and humans have a lot in common, in terms of personality, intellect and emotional states, and so with many of these species in decline, conservationists note that it is more important than ever that we work to save our evolutionary relatives.

Chimpanzees in particular share 98 percent of our DNA, and so their close relationship to humans brings all sorts of ethical questions to mind, such as if they should be afforded the same rights as humans.

Experts behind the book Great Apes and Humans: The Ethics of Coexistence delve into these hot-topic issues and our responsibility towards great apes, both in the wild and in captivity, to ensure their future survival.

"I think ultimately we share this planet with a lot of other biodiversity and we have an obligation to ensure that it can survive," Tara Stoinski, President of the Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund International, told Nature World News (NWN).

"These are some of our closest living relatives; they are linked to our evolutionary past," she continued. "They are an important charismatic species for the forests they live in, and those forests are home to incredible biodiversity that has value in and of itself, but also is really important to the survival of humans on this planet."

Threats to Great Apes

Factors like habitat loss, deforestation, poaching, disease and wild game consumption - commonly referred to as the bushmeat trade - are just a few factors currently affecting apes living in Asia and Africa. If these rates of decline don't change soon, great apes will be gone within the next 10 to 40 years - and that's not even considering the effects of climate change.

"If we don't stop what's happening now, for apes they'll be gone before serious effects of climate change start to take place," Stoinski said. "For the mountain gorillas, for example, that are in a very restricted range, they don't have a lot of places where they can move if their habitat changes a lot from climate change."

Mountain gorillas, as their name implies, live in the forests high in the mountains at elevations of 8,000 to 13,000 feet, according to the World Wildlife Fund (WWF). As the world's smallest population of mountain gorillas - a subspecies of the eastern gorilla - they are split between two places: the Virunga Mountains that border Uganda, Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of Congo, and in the Bwindi Impenetrable National Park in Uganda. (Scroll to read on...)

(Photo : Flickr: Joachim Huber)

Unfortunately, poaching, destruction of habitat, disease and an encroaching human population has taken a toll on their numbers, with just around 880 individuals left struggling to survive.

Not to mention that apes in general are slow to reproduce, and it takes populations a long time to recover. But Stoinski says that there is still hope yet for these animals, as long as humans are ready to go to great lengths to protect them.

The conservation expert noted that based on observation, mountain gorillas - all of which live in national parks - are better able to bounce back through a method called "extreme conservation." This tactic essentially involves bodyguards that watch over these apes 24/7, and the only parts of the protected population seeing an increase in numbers are those benefitting from extreme conservation.

"To us it really pointed out the level of investment that we're going to need to make if we're really going to save some of these species that are so low in number from going extinct. Just living in a park doesn't mean that you're numbers are going to be increasing," Stoinski explained.

But while having a babysitter of sorts appears most effective against poachers, it won't necessarily protect all great ape species from every threat out there.

Orangutans in Borneo, for instance, are mostly in decline due to a disappearing habitat from deforestation. Developers are bulldozing down their lush tropical forests to make way for oil palm plantations and other agricultural uses, and their numbers are only expected to dwindle further.

A century ago there were approximately more than 230,000 orangutans worldwide, the WWF says, but now the Bornean orangutan is estimated to number about 41,000 (and the Sumatran about 7,500).

Great Apes Have Rights Too

But threats for these and other great apes don't just exist in the wild, but in captivity as well. Apes kept in zoos and sanctuaries, or as entertainers and pets aren't always kept in the best of conditions. While just last week a pair of cotton-top tamarins - a critically endangered species - froze to death in a Louisiana zoo after their caregiver allegedly failed to notice them.

A recent study even showed that an upbringing among humans can be costly for chimpanzees, specifically. Chimpanzees raised as pets or performers from an early age suffer long-term behavioral problems as a result. (Scroll to read on...)

(Photo : Flickr: smerikal)

So certain groups are advocating for chimps and other great apes on their behalf, arguing that such closely related species should be afforded the same rights as humans - an idea described as "legal personhood."

"If those rights are provided to them, then they wouldn't be able to be 'prisoned unlawfully' - that is, they wouldn't be able to be kept in zoos or as pets or as entertainers. That is a bit of a radical strategy I think, because of course it raises all sorts of potential problems," Dr. Steven Ross with the Lincoln Park Zoo explained to NWN.

Obviously, lots of ethical concerns come to mind; for instance, Ross notes, should a chimpanzee kill someone, could it be tried for murder?

Ross says that a simpler, less radical strategy could easily be used to help improve the welfare of these amazing animals, which entails setting higher standards for the way they're cared for.

It's also important to remember that the loss of great apes doesn't just mean the loss of various species that hold the secret to our evolutionary past, but also the disappearance of animals vital to our planet and ecosystems.

"If apes were to disappear and if the forests that they live in were to disappear, human lives would be very negatively affected," Stoinski added.

For more great nature science stories and general news, please visit our sister site, Headlines and Global News (HNGN).

post from sitemap

Bizarre New Creature Looks Like a Worm/Snake Hybrid

Ichthyophis cardamomensis
That's one big worm! Or is it a snake? Actually, it's neither. A new species of legless amphibian was recently discovered in Cambodia’s Cardamom Mountains, that is helping conservationists flesh out the region's heavily understudied biodiversity. (Photo : Neang Thy/FFI)

That's one big worm! Or is it a snake? Actually, it's neither. A new species of legless amphibian was recently discovered in Cambodia's Cardamom Mountains that is helping conservationists flesh out the region's heavily understudied biodiversity.

The new species, Ichthyophis cardamomensis, looks a lot like a massive earthworm with a snake's head. Nearly a foot long (30 cm), with a glistening dark brown, evenly-sectioned body, the amphibian is reportedly one of only three unstriped I. caecelians recently discovered (the other two were found in Vietnam).

Often banded or striped, and with no limbs to speak of, most caecelians are simply mistaken for snakes, causing the amphibian group to be frequently overlooked. However, these three new species, as described in the journal Organisms Diversify and Evolution, are exceptionally unique.

That's a big deal for scientists, who they themselves have difficulty telling one caecilian from another. Although they have typical scaleless amphibian skin - clearly different from a snake's - and a skull and bones - differing them from worms - they all look practically the same, even when boasting varied sizes. Researchers often turn to comprehensive morphological and molecular (DNA) analyses to recognize when they have new species on hand.

Zoologists and lead paper author, Peter Geissler from the State Museum of Natural History Stuttgart, Germany, recently explained in a Fauna and Flora International (FFI) release that the "three distinct unstriped Ichthyophiid species... are now described as new species, almost doubling the number of Ichthyophis species known from the Indochinese region."

FFI herpetologist Neang Thy added that discoveries like this are important because it helps experts better understand the region's diversity.

"We are still learning about this area and the animals in it, since it was a region formerly held by the Khmer Rouge and the mountains were closed to researchers until the 1990s," he explained.

Even now open to the world, "the Cardamom region it is under threat from logging, land concessions, and other habitat destruction," Thy added. "The danger of any new species, including the new caecilian, is that they may be discovered one year and go extinct the next."

Understanding local fauna, he and his colleagues press, can help conservationists focus their work to save these remarkable creatures and their habitat.

For more great nature science stories and general news, please visit our sister site, Headlines and Global News (HNGN).

post from sitemap

Migrating Sea Turtles Use Magnetics to Find Home

sea turtle
After they hatch, sea turtles travel for thousands of miles out in the open ocean, later to mysteriously return to the beaches where they were born. And now new research reveals that they use unique magnetic signatures to find their way home again. (Photo : Pixabay)

After they hatch, sea turtles travel for thousands of miles out in the open ocean, later to mysteriously return to the beaches where they were born. And now new research reveals that they use unique magnetic signatures to find their way home again.

"Sea turtles migrate across thousands of miles of ocean before returning to nest on the same stretch of coastline where they hatched, but how they do this has mystified scientists for more than fifty years," researcher J. Roger Brothers of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill said in a statement.

"Our results," he continued, "provide evidence that turtles imprint on the unique magnetic field of their natal beach as hatchlings and then use this information to return as adults."

While previous research has indicated that seat turtles use the Earth's magnetic field as a guide out in the open ocean, scientists still weren't sure if they used the same unique method to locate the comforting beaches they called home.

"We reasoned that if turtles use the magnetic field to find their natal beaches, then naturally occurring changes in the Earth's field might influence where turtles nest," Brothers explained.

So Brothers and his colleagues analyzed a 19-year database of loggerhead nesting along Florida's eastern coast, the largest sea turtle rookery in North America, looking for changes in behavior.

As described in the journal Current Biology, subtle shifts in Earth's magnetic field determined the spatial distribution of turtle nests. For example, when the Earth's field shifted so that magnetic signatures of nearby locales along the beach moved closer together, nesting turtles huddled along a shorter stretch of coastline. In contrast, areas where magnetic signatures deviated caused loggerheads to spread out their nests, making them few and far between.

Scientists suspect that tiny magnetic particles in turtles' brains allow them to sense magnetic signatures emitted by beaches and return to the sites chosen by their mothers; however, more research is needed to say for sure.

As for why they have their sights set on certain beaches, it's because successful nesting requires rare features such as soft sand, perfect temperatures, few predators and easy access; and there's no place like home.

For more great nature science stories and general news, please visit our sister site, Headlines and Global News (HNGN).

post from sitemap

January 15, 2015

What Makes Sharks Sink? Fresh Water

What Makes Sharks Sink? Fresh Water
Sharks may be some of the most fearsome monsters of the sea, but like any good monster, they come with an unexpected weakness. Much like the Wicked Witch of the West, if a shark finds itself surrounded by fresh water, it's in big trouble. (Photo : Flickr: Teddy Fotiou)

Sharks may be some of the most fearsome monsters of the sea, but like any good monster, they come with an unexpected weakness. Much like the Wicked Witch of the West, if a shark finds itself surrounded by fresh water, it's in big trouble.

That's at least according to a study recently published in the Journal of Experimental Biology, which details how the physiology of a whopping 95 percent of all elasmobranchs - that's all sharks, rays, and skates - boast outdated oily livers used for flotation and buoyancy.

Many modern fresh-water dwelling fish boast complex bladders that are complete with air chambers - which allow them to regulate buoyancy much like the cuttlefish's unique and porous chemical chambered cuttlebone.

The oil bladder, in comparison, is far more simple, and not nearly as effective at maintaining buoyancy in changing depths. Additionally, objects are naturally more buoyant in salt water because salt water naturally boasts a greater density.

In a study of bull sharks - one of the few sharks that travel from oceans to freshwater rivers and swamps - researcher found that because of a loss of buoyancy they wind up spending about 50 more energy on lift.

For most sharks, with their inadequate livers, they would sink like a stone in freshwater. The researchers theorized that sharks could compensate for this by boasting wider and less sleek bodies, sacrificing hydrodynamics for the sake of a larger and more buoyant liver. And yet, even that is just not enough.

The data seems to reflect this. Of the five bull sharks and 17 largetooth sawfish (a bottom dwelling shark relative) involved in the study, all were found to be consistently less buoyant (an average of 27 percent less buoyant) in their habitats, compared to their ocean dwelling counterparts, despite their extra fatty livers.

This inadequacy, the authors suggest, may very well be what has kept elasmobranchs stuck in the ocean, their livers telling them that freshwater is just simply not where they belong.

For more great nature science stories and general news, please visit our sister site, Headlines and Global News (HNGN).

post from sitemap

Ancient Sea Scorpions Had Landlubber Legs

scorpion and molted exoskeleton
Paleontologists have unearthed the fossils of our modern day scorpions' most ancient forefathers - creatures that have long been suspected to stalk the ocean's depths hundreds of millions of years ago. Interestingly, the latest sample, however, appears, to have legs that would have been ideal for steady strides on land as well. (Photo : Waddington et al. 2015 Biology Letters)

Paleontologists have unearthed the fossils of our modern day scorpions' most ancient forefathers - creatures that have long been suspected to stalk the ocean's depths hundreds of millions of years ago. Interestingly, the latest sample, however, appears, to have legs that would have been ideal for steady strides on land as well.

That's at least according to a study recently published in the journal Biology Letters which details how the 430 million year old remains of scorpion ancestor Eramoscorpius brucensis boasted unique appendages for walking on dry and wet ground alike.

The remains, discovered by quarry workers in Bruce Peninsula in Ontario, Canada, were closely analyzed by paleobiologist Janet Waddington and her associates at the Royal Ontario Museum in Toronto and the Museum für Naturkunde in Berlin.

According to the study, these unusual land-ready limbs lave a short bottom section that resembles a foot. While earlier scorpions may have used a combination of stilt-like appendages and buoyancy to stay standing on the ocean floor, this foot-like addition is often recognized as something specifically adapted for land stability.

Waddington and her colleagues suspect that this scorpion was still an aquatic animal, especially based on where it was discovered and the state of the fossil's preservation. However, they suggest that this adaptation could have been very helpful during the creature's molting season.

When shedding their exoskeletons, the scorpions were most vulnerable to other predators on the ocean floor. With limbs that could help them climb a little higher, closer to dry land, they may have put themselves in territory where they were less familiar, and thus avoided.

For more great nature science stories and general news, please visit our sister site, Headlines and Global News (HNGN).

post from sitemap

Renewed Monarch Decline After 'Good Intentions' Go Awry

monarchs
Efforts to save the declining monarch butterfly across the United States may have severely backfired, with many gardeners unwittingly trapping and exposing these near-endangered insects to harmful parasites. (Photo : David R. Tribble)

Efforts to save the declining monarch butterfly across the United States may have severely backfired, with many gardeners unwittingly trapping and exposing these near-endangered insects to harmful parasites.

Each year, by the end of autumn, millions of Monarch butterflies in the northeastern United States and Canada start to wing their way towards Mexico in a stunning 2,500-mile journey. They traditionally spend their winter there, among the volcanic mountains of Central Mexico, which are spotted with ideal fir tree habitats.

However, past logging activity in these protected regions has begun to shrink the monarch wintering habitat, and fewer and fewer butterflies have been seen making their annual migration.

In fact, just last January the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) revealed that nearly 44 percent of the forestland occupied by monarchs in and near Mexico's Monarch Butterfly Biosphere Reserve during 2012's winter months had disappeared by 2013.

Worse still, the 2013 migrating population boasted the lowest count of monarchs since 1993 (the year scientists started to monitor monarch butterfly colonies), according to research released by the WWF-Telcel Alliance and the Monarch Butterfly Biosphere Reserve Office of the Mexican government.

Many US butterfly watchers have made a habit of traveling to popular migration routes to watch flocks of these brilliant orange, yellow, and black butterflies nearly blot out the Sun as they flutter into Mexico by mid-November. This helped news of their decline spread like wildfire, as these stunning sightings appear to have grown less common each year.

Back in December it was even reported by the US Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) that the butterflies had declined by a whopping 90 percent over the past 20 years, making them a strong contender to be granted federal protections under the Endangered Species Act. (Scroll to read on...)

(Photo : Flickr: Luna sin estrellas)

In the wake of all this, butterfly buffs started calling for action, asking everyday gardeners to break out their spades and start planting milkweed - a pretty and easy-to-grow flower that butterflies love. It also grows well in the climates of the southern United States.

The hope was that monarchs on their annual journey would see these milkweed gardens and decide to start their holiday early, wintering in backyards along the Gulf Coast and in Texas, in addition to the Mexican fir forests.

And unfortunately, this idea seems to be working. But why is that unfortunate?

The only species of milkweed widely available in the United States is Asclepias curassavica - an imported tropical rendition of the butterfly-friendly plant. These plants don't die off in winter like their northern-born cousins, and can serve as a place for monarchs to feed and lay their eggs year-round. The result is that many monarchs have stopped migrating altogether.

And while that is bad news for sight-seers, it will at least give the monarch populations a chance to recover from decline, right?

Wrong. According to a study recently published in the journal Proceedings of the Royal Society B, monarch populations that spend their winters in southern US gardens are up to nine times more likely to become infected with a dangerous parasite, compared to butterflies who migrate all the way down to Mexico.

That's because milkweed can naturally host a protozoan parasite called Ophryocystis elektroscirrha (OE). If a monarch caterpillar takes its meals from an infected plant, it will wind up ingesting these tiny parasites as well, and when it hatches from its chrysalis, it will be covered in debilitating spores.

Infected butterflies have far less energy than their healthy counterparts, don't live nearly as long, and are less likely to successfully reproduce. What's worse, if they try to migrate, they are doomed to fail, researcher Dara Satterfield explained to Science magazine.

This is why the migration is a necessary thing, she said, as it "weeds out some of the sick monarchs each year." (Scroll to read on...)

A monarch rests on a tropical milkweed plant.
(Photo : Wiki - Derek Ramsey - 2008 (Ram-Man)) A monarch rests on a tropical milkweed plant.

As winter presses on and northern milkweed dies, these butterflies are forced to get moving, and most adults who are infected wind up never making it to Mexico. When the butterflies return to the northern US in the spring "they start over fresh" with new, clean milkweed, Satterfield added.

And this is why the good intentions of gardeners may be causing even more trouble for the delicate insects, where tropical milkweed is tricking the monarchs into abandoning their migratory ways, and keeping a harmful OE presence strong.

According to the study, many new breeding sites in the southern US already boast a 100 percent infection rate. That's exceptionally bad news even for monarchs returning from the Mexican forests as they may be tempted to make a pit stop, or end their journey entirely, in someone's infected backyard.

So what can we do? Karen Oberhauser, a conservation biologist at the University of Minnesota, argues that once again, backyard gardeners need to rally. Awareness of this new milkweed problem, she told Science, is the first step, and second would be to have these gardeners replace their tropical plants with native northern milkweeds.

"It's a problem we can solve," she said, emphasizing that the good intentions of gardeners can still be put to good use.

Having trouble finding native milkweed seeds? They are still not nearly as common as the tropical variety, but the Xerces society, in support of the North American Monarch Conservation Plan, has recently taken action in collaboration with the native seed industry, the USDA-NRCS Plant Materials Program, and various community partners to create sources of milkweed seed in California, the Great Basin, Arizona, New Mexico, Texas, and Florida.

You can use the milkweed seed finder here to find seed sources in your state.

For more great nature science stories and general news, please visit our sister site, Headlines and Global News (HNGN).

post from sitemap

January 14, 2015

Tickling Lab Rats is Good For Science

lab rat
(Photo : Wiki CC0 -Janet Stephens)

Researcher are always looking for ways to improve the accuracy of their findings, and one of these ways is to ensure that they know about each and every factor that can influence a lab subject. Now, a new study has found that to ensure that lab rats are not too stressed after feeling the bite of a hypodermic needle, you simply have to tickle them.

The fact that mice are ticklish and take the same kind of joy out of the experience that humans do is not exactly new news.

The Laughing Rats

Back in the late 1990s, neuroscientist Jaak Panksepp discovered that as lab rats played with one another, they emitted unique ultrasonic chirps that were associated with a positive emotional state. Panksepp and his colleagues quickly came to the conclusion that these chirps could only best be described as laughter, and if rats could laugh, was is possible that they could be ticklish too?

Back in 2000, the Oct. issue of Behavioral Brain Research detailed a study that investigated just that, with Panksepp and Jeffery Burgdorf at the J.P. Scott Center for Neuroscience, Mind and Behavior, at Bowling Green State University, slipping on their doctors' gloves to administer some "playful, experimenter-administered manual stimulation."

This stimulation - you or I would call it "ticking" - was performed in a very specific way for the sake of consistency. According to Panksepp, the only scientific way to tickle a rat is done with the right hand.

"The tickling... consisted of rapid initial finger movements across the back with a focus on the neck, followed by rapidly turning the animals over on their backs, with vigorous tickling of their ventral surface (belly), followed by release after a few seconds of stimulation," the researcher wrote. "This was repeated throughout each tickling session. Even though the tickling was brisk and assertive, care was taken not to frighten the animals."

Amazingly, these tickling sessions always induced that tiny rodent laughter, and the researchers started to organize their rats based on who seemed to enjoy ticking the most and laughed the hardest. (Scroll to read on...)

They then bred four generations of these rats, specifically selecting for high and low ticking responses.

"The high tickle line showed quicker acquisition of an instrumental task for, as well as less avoidance of, tickling as compared to the random and low tickle lines," Panksepp observed.

Additionally, the ticklish and hearty laughers played more.

Well, Tickle Me Optimistic

Then, in 2012, a new study published in the journal PLOS One provided evidence that tickling not only made these rats laugh, but made them optimistic as well.

For this study, a large group of rats were taught to listen to one of two tones, press a level, and then either receive a mild electric shock or a tasty treat. They quickly learned to press the lever only when hearing the tone for food, and avoided the lever when the shock-associated tone was played.

However, when a new and ambiguous tone was played, the rats were suddenly given a choice: risk the lever, or play it safe?

Amazingly, the researchers found that rats who were tickled right before being presented with this choice were far more likely to take the risk, compared to rats who were simply handled before choice time.

The study's authors suggested that the tickled rats were put in a better mood by the tickling, prompting them to be more optimistic about the tone. This also provided the first solid evidence that ticking could influence a rat's behavior.

A Behavioral Balancing Act

So what exactly did that discovery mean for science? For one, it added one more factor to the ever-mounting list of lab-animal influences.

New research has shown that rats are not actually superior to mice for behavioral and neural studies, with both animals capable of complex cognitive tasks and expressing varied personalities. Past studies have also revealed that male rats and mice often grow nervous after smelling male researchers - their stress levels potentially skewing chemical and behavioral data. (Scroll to read on...)

(Photo : Wiki CC0 - Jason Snyder)

And this revelation has caused researchers to worry that stressful stimulus, such as the prick of a needle during a necessary injection, can put these animals into a state of mind that could influence their behavior.

That's where laughter gets to prove itself really as the best medicine.

A study published just this year in the journal Applied Animal Behavior Science has found that although ticking can indeed influence rat behavior, it can also serve as a powerful tool in preventing more adverse influences.

"We hypothesized that administering playful tickles before and/or after routine ... injections would reduce the aversiveness of such medical procedures," co-author Sylvie Cloutier, from Washington State University, wrote in the study.

To test this, she and her colleagues tickled some rats before, and some after regular saline injections. A third injection group was unlucky enough to receive no tickling. They then compared the levels of discomfort felt by each rat during the procedure, measuring how much they fought their restraints, and how frequently they audibly complained.

Interestingly, the researchers found that rats may be best off if ticked right before an injection, as the good mood from tickling "had a carry-over effect" that counteracted the "negative states" that the saline injection could put the rats in .

That is to say that tickling a rat right before injection helped it say "this isn't so bad" during and right after a procedure.

So tickle your rats, scientists! You data tables (and rats) will thank you.

For more great nature science stories and general news, please visit our sister site, Headlines and Global News (HNGN).

post from sitemap

January 13, 2015

Mass Die-Offs Increase for Birds, Fish

dead fish
According to a new study, mass die-offs have been increasing for birds, fish and marine invertebrates over the last several decades, affecting nearly 2,500 animal species. (Photo : noomhh / Fotolia)

According to a new study, mass die-offs have been increasing for birds, fish and marine invertebrates over the last several decades, affecting nearly 2,500 animal species.

A mass die-off occurs when a large percentage of a population perishes in a short amount of time. Though these events are rare and don't necessarily drive a species to extinction, they still pack a devastating punch and are capable of killing more than 90 percent of a population in one fell swoop. There have been 727 mass mortality events within the last 70 years, and this study is the first to calculate their frequency and magnitude, as well as determine their causes.

The findings were published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

In an analysis of previous studies and data, focusing on the period from 1940 to the present, researchers found that disease was primarily to blame for the downfall of many animal populations - accounting for 26 percent of the mass die-offs. Climate processes, including weather extremes, thermal and oxygen stress, or starvation came in second overall, contributing about 25 percent to mass mortality events.

Humans played a part as well, with activities such as environmental contamination causing 19 percent of the mass kills. In addition, biotoxicity triggered by events such as algae blooms were a significant contributor, though the most devastating die-offs were those that had multiple origins.

And these catastrophic killings show no signs of stopping. According to the results, the number of mass die-offs has long been on the rise, increasing by about one event per year over the 70-year study period.

"Going from one event to 70 each year is a substantial increase, especially given the increased magnitudes of mass mortality events for some of these organisms," study co-lead author Adam Siepielski, an assistant professor of biology at the University of San Diego, explained in a statement.

Interestingly, while birds, fish and marine invertebrates are suffering, the number of mass die-offs for reptiles and amphibians seems to be decreasing, while it remains unchanged for mammals.

"The catastrophic nature of sudden, mass die-offs of animal populations inherently captures human attention," added senior author Stephanie Carlson.

For more great nature science stories and general news, please visit our sister site, Headlines and Global News (HNGN).

post from sitemap

January 12, 2015

Fish Use 'Sixth Sense' to Detect Water Flows

fish
Fish apparently use a "sixth sense" to detect water flows, solving a long-standing mystery of how these aquatic creatures respond to their environment, according to a new study. (Photo : ead72 / Fotolia)

Fish apparently use a "sixth sense" to detect water flows, solving a long-standing mystery of how these aquatic creatures respond to their environment, according to a new study.

It is well known that fish do things like avoid obstacles, use less energy by slaloming between vortices, or whirlpools, and tracking changes in water flow left by prey, all while coming off as carefree swimmers. But how do they respond to changes in their environment this way without even being able to rely on their eyesight?

"We identified a unique layout of flow sensors on the surface of fish that is nearly universal across species, and our research asks why this is so," study author Leif Ristroph, from New York University, said in a statement. "The network of these sensors is like a 'hydrodynamic antenna' that allows them to retrieve signals about the flow of water and use this information in different behaviors."

The findings were published in the journal Physical Review Letters.

To get to the bottom of this "sixth sense," researchers focused on a fish's "lateral line" - a system of sensory organs known to detect both movement and vibration in the water that surrounds them. They also looked at canals that they posses which open to the environment via numerous pores. They subjected a fish model of a rainbow trout to several real-life aquatic conditions, including changes in water flow that altered water pressure or mimicked the presence of "prey."

Their results showed that the locations of the canal system was key to their sensory abilities, found on the body wherever strong variations in pressure occur, such as on the head.

"You can't put pressure sensors on a live fish and have it behave normally," said co-author James Liao. "This was a creative way to use engineering and physics techniques to answer biological questions you can't answer otherwise."

For more great nature science stories and general news, please visit our sister site, Headlines and Global News (HNGN).

post from sitemap